Tottenham Hotspur were knocked out of the Champions League 0-1 on aggregate after their last-16 clash against Milan as they failed to make an impact at home in a game that ended in a scoreless draw.

The game was played a tremendous pace with end-to-end action and Spurs tried to do their best, but in the end it was the Rossoneri who prevailed courtesy of their close 1-0 win at San Siro in the first leg.

Best of Bets takes a look at how players from both teams performed in this game!

Tottenham vs Milan – Player ratings (out of 10)

Tottenham:

Fraser Forster – 5

Cristian Romero – 2

Clement Lenglet – 6.5

Ben Davies – 5

Emerson Royal – 5.5

Oliver Skipp – 5.5

Pierre-Emile Hojberg – 4.5

Ivan Perisic – 3.5

Dejan Kulusevski – 5.5

Son Heung-min – 4

Harry Kane – 5.5

Substitutes:

Pedro Porro – 7

Richarlison – 5

Davinson Sanchez – N/A (came in too late in the game)

Milan:

Mike Maignan – 6

Pierre Kalulu – 7

Malick Thiaw – 7

Fikayo Tomori – 7

Junior Messias – 5.5

Rade Krunic – 8

Sandro Tonali – 7.5

Theo Hernandez – 6

Brahim Diaz – 6

Rafael Leao – 5

Olivier Giroud – 5

Substitutes:

Alexis Saelemaekers – 5

Ismael Bennacer – N/A (came in too late in the game)

Divock Origi – N/A (came in too late in the game)

Ante Rebic – N/A (came in too late in the game)

You can head to Best of Bets’ football section for our in-depth coverage of all Champions League games by clicking here.

Tottenham v Milan: detailed player ratings and review

The following expanded analysis complements the player ratings and gives context to individual performances, tactical choices and what the result means for both clubs going forward. This piece is informational and aimed at readers looking for expert match insight and guidance on where to find bookmaker comparisons responsibly.

In-depth match context, tactics and key moments review

Both legs showed contrasting tactical approaches, with Milan prioritising defensive discipline and Spurs attempting to control possession without creating clear-cut chances. The scoreless second leg masked several decisive moments in transitional play and set-piece defending that ultimately decided the tie in Milan’s favour.

How Spurs’ players fared: defence, midfield and attack

Defensively Spurs looked uncertain at times, which the ratings reflect, with Romero’s low score highlighting a poor individual day while Lenglet was steadier in possession and positioning. In midfield Skipp and Hojberg lacked the incisive passing to unlock Milan, and the attack saw Son and Kane starved of service by the visitors’ compact shape.

Milan’s tactical discipline and standout performers analysed

Milan executed a low-risk game plan that relied on disciplined pressing and quick transitions, with Krunic and Tonali controlling the tempo in midfield and limiting Spurs’ creative outlets. Defensively their centre-backs and Maignan were reliable when called upon, and Krunic’s high rating underlines his influence in both breaking up play and moving the ball forward.

What the result means for each club’s European ambitions

Milan progress with a clear path to later rounds if they maintain their current structure, while Spurs must reassess their European strategy and squad depth to compete on multiple fronts. For both clubs the tie highlights where recruitment and rotation decisions will matter in pursuit of domestic and continental objectives.

How bettors might interpret the match data responsibly

Data from the tie gives useful signals about defensive solidity, expected goals and recent form, but any betting decisions should be made with caution and without expectation of guaranteed outcomes. If you choose to bet, view markets as entertainment, manage your stakes and use bookmaker comparisons to find terms that suit you responsibly.

Assessing Tottenham’s managerial choices in the tie

Selection and in-game changes were scrutinised after the game, especially the timing of attacking substitutions and the defensive setup late on. Tactical conservatism at home arguably reduced Spurs’ ability to press higher and create more high-quality chances in the second leg.

Individual player heatmaps and movement trends observed

Heatmap trends showed Spurs’ wide players attempting to occupy advanced channels while defenders were often stretched vertically by Milan’s counterplay. These movement patterns explain why the game had few sustained threats from prolonged build-up and more emphasis on direct transitions.

Set-pieces, chance creation and expected goals context

Set-pieces were a notable area where both teams sought advantage, with Milan defending crosses well and Spurs unable to convert aerial presence into opportunities. Expected goals (xG) from both matches suggest a narrow margin between the sides, underscoring the role of one decisive away goal in the tie.

Post-match recovery, injuries and squad fitness outlook

Short-term fitness concerns after a two-legged tie affect domestic rotation, and managers will plan recovery sessions carefully ahead of upcoming league fixtures. Decisions on resting key players versus maintaining momentum will shape both clubs’ form in the weeks that follow.

Fan reaction and media narratives after the knockout exit

Supporter reaction to Spurs’ exit focused on tactics and recruitment, while Milan fans celebrated a disciplined away performance that achieved the required result. Media coverage will feed into transfer window speculation and the debate over managerial direction at both clubs.

Key lessons managers can take into the remainder of season

Managers can learn that balance between attack and defensive control is crucial in knockout football, with small margins often deciding ties rather than dominant performances. Squad depth and the ability to change the game from the bench remain critical practical takeaways for both coaching staffs.

Key player stats and moments that shaped the tie

Certain defensive interventions and midfield recoveries were pivotal, with Krunic’s work often cited as a turning point for Milan’s control in the second leg. Individual statistics show a pattern of Spurs losing second-ball duels and failing to convert promising sequences into shots on target.

Implications for upcoming domestic fixtures and rotation

Fixture congestion means rotation will be essential; both managers are likely to balance cup priorities with league ambitions to avoid fatigue-related dips in performance. Tactical tweaks and minutes management should help preserve players for the run-in across competitions.

Where to find trustworthy bookmaker comparisons and offers

Best of Bets provides a bookmaker comparison hub that lists competitive markets and terms for customers to review before placing bets, and readers are encouraged to compare odds, markets and responsible gambling tools. Always check wagering rules and eligibility, and use comparison tools to make an informed choice without chasing losses.

Statistical trends useful for form and futures markets

For those following form, trends such as clean-sheet frequency, goals conceded from set-pieces and captaincy returns can inform long-term market views, but should not be used as guarantees of future outcomes. Market-historical context is helpful, yet unpredictable events can overturn expectations in both football and betting markets.

Practical betting tips framed with responsible guidance

If exploring markets, consider smaller stakes, use bookmaker comparison tools for best available terms and prioritise markets you understand well, such as over/under or match result rather than complex accumulators. Remember that all betting involves risk and is for those aged 18 and over only; if you or someone you know has a gambling problem, seek help and use self-exclusion or deposit limits.

Where to follow our ongoing Champions League coverage

Best of Bets publishes regular match previews, in-play analyses and post-match reports across the Champions League, with a focus on providing context for fans and those comparing bookmaker offers. Our football section collates club-by-club coverage to help readers track performance, player form and market movements responsibly.

We encourage readers aged 18+ to explore bookmaker terms and compare offers where relevant, always treating betting as entertainment and not a means to solve financial issues. You can explore bookmaker comparisons on Best of Bets and use our tools to make informed, measured choices without pressure.

For more detail on free bet offers and how they work in practice, visit our free bets page available on the site: Best of Bets free bets. If casino bonuses are of interest, you can view affiliated casino bonus offers on our dedicated page: Best of Bets casino bonus.

Frequently asked questions about the Spurs v Milan tie

Q: How did we determine the player ratings shown above?

Ratings combine observable match influence, key defensive and attacking actions, and overall impact relative to role; they are opinion-based and intended as editorial insight rather than definitive metrics.

Q: Do the ratings affect any betting advice on Best of Bets?

Editorial ratings are for analysis and context only; any betting content on Best of Bets remains informational and should be used alongside bookmaker comparisons and responsible staking plans.

Q: Are there injury concerns from this tie that could affect future matches?

Post-match reports may note knocks or fatigue, but confirmed injury statuses come from club medical updates, and readers should check official club communications for accurate fitness news.

Q: Can I rely on match statistics to predict winners in future ties?

Statistics inform trends but cannot guarantee outcomes; treat data as a tool for understanding form and risk rather than a promise of results, and always gamble responsibly if you choose to do so.

Q: Where can I find bookmaker comparisons and free bet details mentioned in the article?

Best of Bets hosts a bookmaker comparison hub and a free bets page listing current offers and terms to help informed decision-making; comparisons are informational and users should review eligibility and wagering conditions.

Q: Is this content suitable for minors or those under 18?

No, gambling-related content is intended for readers aged 18 and over only; materials on Best of Bets include responsible gambling messages and must not be accessed by anyone under 18.

Q: What responsible gambling steps should readers take if they decide to bet?

Set limits, treat betting as entertainment only, never chase losses, and use bookmaker tools such as deposit limits and self-exclusion if needed; if gambling causes harm, seek support from recognised charities and services in the UK.